България България Bosna i Hercegovina Bosna i Hercegovina Česko Česko Danmark Danmark Österreich Österreich Schweiz (Deutsch) Schweiz (Deutsch) Deutschland Deutschland Ελλάδα Ελλάδα United Kingdom United Kingdom Ireland Ireland España España Eesti Eesti Suomi Suomi Suisse (Français) Suisse (Français) France France Hrvatska Hrvatska Magyarország Magyarország Ísland Ísland Italia Italia Lietuva Lietuva Latvija Latvija Северна Македонија Северна Македонија Malta Malta Norge Norge België België Nederland Nederland Polska Polska Portugal Portugal România România Slovensko Slovensko Slovenija Slovenija Srbija Srbija Sverige Sverige Türkiye Türkiye Україна Україна Brasil Brasil United States (English) United States (English) Estados Unidos (Español) Estados Unidos (Español) Argentina Argentina Canada (English) Canada (English) Canada (Français) Canada (Français) Chile Chile Colombia Colombia Ecuador Ecuador México México Perú Perú Belize Belize Guyana Guyana Jamaica Jamaica Venezuela Venezuela Costa Rica Costa Rica Curaçao Curaçao República Dominicana República Dominicana Guatemala Guatemala Honduras Honduras Nicaragua Nicaragua Panamá Panamá Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Suriname Suriname El Salvador El Salvador الإمارات العربية المتحدة الإمارات العربية المتحدة البحرين البحرين مصر مصر ישראל ישראל ایران ایران الأردن الأردن عُمان عُمان قطر قطر پاکستان پاکستان لبنان لبنان الكويت الكويت المملكة العربية السعودية المملكة العربية السعودية Suid-Afrika Suid-Afrika العراق العراق Australia Australia India India Malaysia Malaysia New Zealand New Zealand Philippines Philippines Singapore Singapore Indonesia Indonesia 日本 日本 대한민국 대한민국 ไทย ไทย Việt Nam Việt Nam 中国大陆 中国大陆 中国香港特别行政区 中国香港特别行政区 中国台湾 中国台湾
България България Bosna i Hercegovina Bosna i Hercegovina Česko Česko Danmark Danmark Österreich Österreich Schweiz (Deutsch) Schweiz (Deutsch) Deutschland Deutschland Ελλάδα Ελλάδα United Kingdom United Kingdom Ireland Ireland España España Eesti Eesti Suomi Suomi Suisse (Français) Suisse (Français) France France Hrvatska Hrvatska Magyarország Magyarország Ísland Ísland Italia Italia Lietuva Lietuva Latvija Latvija Северна Македонија Северна Македонија Malta Malta Norge Norge België België Nederland Nederland Polska Polska Portugal Portugal România România Slovensko Slovensko Slovenija Slovenija Srbija Srbija Sverige Sverige Türkiye Türkiye Україна Україна Brasil Brasil United States (English) United States (English) Estados Unidos (Español) Estados Unidos (Español) Argentina Argentina Canada (English) Canada (English) Canada (Français) Canada (Français) Chile Chile Colombia Colombia Ecuador Ecuador México México Perú Perú Belize Belize Guyana Guyana Jamaica Jamaica Venezuela Venezuela Costa Rica Costa Rica Curaçao Curaçao República Dominicana República Dominicana Guatemala Guatemala Honduras Honduras Nicaragua Nicaragua Panamá Panamá Puerto Rico Puerto Rico Suriname Suriname El Salvador El Salvador الإمارات العربية المتحدة الإمارات العربية المتحدة البحرين البحرين مصر مصر ישראל ישראל ایران ایران الأردن الأردن عُمان عُمان قطر قطر پاکستان پاکستان لبنان لبنان الكويت الكويت المملكة العربية السعودية المملكة العربية السعودية Suid-Afrika Suid-Afrika العراق العراق Australia Australia India India Malaysia Malaysia New Zealand New Zealand Philippines Philippines Singapore Singapore Indonesia Indonesia 日本 日本 대한민국 대한민국 ไทย ไทย Việt Nam Việt Nam 中国大陆 中国大陆 中国香港特别行政区 中国香港特别行政区 中国台湾 中国台湾

La gestione delle VLU con Aquacel® Ag+ Extra™ rispetto alle medicazioni DACC è stata associata a

  • Tasso di chiusura completa della lesione significativamente migliore (74,8%) alla settimana 12
  • Tempo di chiusura della lesione significativamente più breve in 56 giorni 
  • Percentuale significativamente maggiore (85,2%) di riduzione dell'area della lesione
  • Tasso significativamente più elevato (77,1%) di progressione clinica soddisfacente
  • Minore incidenza di eventi avversi (AE)
  • QoL migliorata13
testo

BEC*, un tensioattivo, riduce la tensione superficiale per migliorare le prestazioni anti-biofilm della medicazione Aquacel® Ag+ Extra™. 14,15,16

EDTA, un agente chelante dei metalli, l'EDTA aiuta a disgregare il biofilm rimuovendo gli ioni metallici che tengono insieme la matrice EPS per esporre i microrganismi agli effetti antimicrobici dell'argento ionico. 15,17,18,19

ARGENTO IONICO, un antimicrobico ad ampio spettro contenuto in quantità sicura ed efficace (1,2%) assicura la morte cellulare dei batteri esposti danneggiando il DNA, denaturando proteine ed enzimi e interferendo con la sintesi proteica. 4,20,21

Lo sviluppo della tecnologia MORE THAN SILVER™ ha comportato la ricerca di un'ampia gamma di agenti disgreganti il biofilm e tensioattivi in combinazione con l'argento ionico. 4

1.Beraldo S. et al. Effectiveness of an enhanced silver-containing dressing in hard-to-heal venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Wound Care, 2025.

2.Meredith K, et al. Assessment of the Antibiofilm Performance of Silver-Containing Wound Dressings: A Dual-Species Biofilm Model. Cureus. 2024;16(9):e70086.

3.Meredith et al. Assessment of Silver-Containing Gelling Fiber Dressings Against Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens Using an in vitro Biofilm Model. Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Nov 2;16:7015-7019.

4.Bowler PG & Parsons D. Combatting wound biofilm and recalcitrance with a novel anti-biofilm Hydrofiber® wound dressing. Wound Medicine 14 (2016) 6–11.

5.Rice JB et al. Burden of diabetic foot ulcers for medicare and private insurers. Diabetes Care 2014;37(3):651–658.

6.Martinengo L et al. Prevalence of chronic wounds in the general population: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Ann Epidemiol 2019;29:8–15.

7.Sen CK. Human Wound and Its Burden: Updated 2020 Compendium of Estimates. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2021;10(5):281–292.

8.Olsson M et al. The humanistic and economic burden of chronic wounds: A systematic review. Wound Repair Regen 2019;27(1):114–125.

9.Chan B et al. Cost-of-illness studies in chronic ulcers: a systematic review. J Wound Care 2017;26(Suppl 4):S4–S14.

10.James GA et al. Biofilms in chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen 2008;16(1):37–44.

11.Malone M et al. The prevalence of biofilms in chronic wounds: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published data. J Wound Care 2017;26(1):20–25.

12.1708881v1 Instruction for Use, Convatec.

13.WC-22-435 clinical study report, Convatec 2024.

14.Parsons. Composition comprising antimicrobial metal ions and a quaternary cationic surfactant. WO2012136968A1.

15.Murphy et al. International consensus document. Embedding Wound Hygiene into a proactive wound healing strategy. J Wound Care 2022;31:S1–S24.

16.Hall-Stoodley L I et al. Towards diagnostic guidelines for biofilm-associated infections. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012; 65:127–145.

17.Wolcott RD et al. Biofilm maturity studies indicate sharp debridement opens a time dependent therapeutic window. J Wound Care. 2010 Aug;19(8):320-8.

18.Banin et al. Chelator-Induced Dispersal and Killing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Cells in Biofilm. Appl. Environ. Microbiol 2006; 72: 2064-2069.

19.Finnegan & Percival. EDTA: an antimicrobial and antibiofilm agent for use in wound care. Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle) 2015; 4: 415–421.

20.Lansdown. Silver 1: Its antibacterial properties and mechanisms of action. J Wound Care 2002; 11: 125-130.

21.Lansdown. The role of silver. Eur Tissue Rep Soc 2002; 9: 108-111.

*BEC, cloruro di benzetonio

® / ™ tutti i marchi sono di proprietà delle società del gruppo Convatec. ©2025 Convatec Inc. AP-73302-ITA-ITA-v1

Questo sito Internet può fornire link o riferimenti ad altri siti, ma Convatec non ha alcuna responsabilità per il contenuto di tali siti e non sarà responsabile per eventuali danni o lesioni derivanti da tale contenuto. I link ad altri siti sono forniti solo per comodità agli utenti di questo sito Internet.

Continuare?

Attenzione

Non sono un operatore